Migration Development Nexus: South Asian Perspective

Author:   Rakesh Ranjan

View PDF

Migration Development Nexus: South Asian Perspective

Introduction

Migration is one of the defining global issues of the early twenty-first century. Approximately 175 million people, including 10.4 million refugees reside outside their home country, or put another way, one out of every 35 individuals in the world is a migrant(IOM 2003). There is not a single country or Society claim to be untouched by human mobility. The reasons behind this increase in population mobility are numerous, but globalization is most convenient (although not necessarily satisfactory) explanation. Many factors such as the development of cheap and accessible transnational means of transport, the creation of real-time networks of electronic communication, the redefinition of individual and family identities across continents, and the income differences between developed and developing countries foster the migration.

South Asian Countries have experienced a sharp increase in remittance during the past three decades. In 2014, South Asia received a $116 billion of remittances, second only after East Asia (World Bank, 2015). Transfer of remittance to South Asian Region has seen a 4.5 percent rise in 2014 compared to 2.5 percent in 2013. Countries like Pakistan saw an increase of 16 percent followed by Sri Lanka (9.6 percent) and Bangladesh (8 percent). For India (0.7 percent), probably because of falling value of rupees hampered the remittance investment, but continuous flow of remittances from the Middle East and Southeast helped to be a top receiving country in the world. In 2013 only, India received $71 billion of remittances followed by China, Philippines, and Mexico (World Bank, 2013). The amount received by India is nearly 4% of its GDP and provides a significant boost on the micro as well as the macro level of society.

Country

Remittances in 2013 (Million)

Remittances as % of GDP 2013

Bangladesh

14,228

12

India

71,000

4

Nepal

5,210

25

Pakistan

14,990

6

Sri Lanka

6,690

10

 

Migration and Development

Migration remittance is one of the most important links between migration and development. It plays a useful role in reducing poverty, decrease in everyday risk from external socks, the betterment of life prospects, and many other positive aspects, which provide a convenient angle for approaching the complex migration agenda. In the real sense, remittances are a personal flow of money from migrants to friends and families, which need to be better utilized for the multiplier effect. The Human Development Report 2009, Overcoming Barriers: Human mobility and development has noted that ‘financial remittances are vital to improving the livelihoods of millions of people in developing countries (UNDP 2009: 71). Many empirical studies have confirmed the positive contribution of international remittances to household welfare, nutrition, food, health and living conditions in places of origin.

Remittance Transfer in South Asia

Among the regions, South Asia is the second largest remittance recipient in 2013 following the East Asia and Pacific. Remittance one of the direct outcomes of international migration is the most beneficial private transactions in the global economy. This often stems from relatively developed economies and goes to the migrant households located in the developed countries. The south Asian region draws nearly one-fourth of the global remittance volume that contributes on average to over ten per cent of GDP of South Asian Countries (Rahman at el. 2014). The formal remittances inflows to South Asia have been increasing from $16.13 billion in 2000 to $111 billion in 2013 and supposed to reach $136 billion in 2016 (World Bank, 2013). Total remittance transfer from South Asia reached $111 billion in 2013, where India alone contributed $71 billion.

Among the South Asian countries, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh ranks first, seventh and eighth in the world, respectively regarding volume of remittances received in 2013. As a share of gross domestic product, Nepal receives the largest formal remittance inflows (25%) among the South Asian countries and ranks third in the world, followed by Bangladesh (12%), and Sri Lanka (10%). Remittances are also the most important external funding source for the countries in South Asia (World Bank, 2014). In 2009, remittances in South Asia were three times larger than foreign direct investments and more than ten times greater than official development assistance. Concerning origins of remittances to South Asia, the Middle East countries are the largest recipient of South Asian migrant workers and correspondingly, a number of payments originated from the three countries, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar is account over 60% of the total remittance (estimated) inflow to South Asia. India is a significant country both as a remittance sending and receiving (Ozaki, 2012). The total remittances inflow to India amounted $49.5 billion in 2009, while the remittance outflow was $2.8 billion.

The Human Development Report 2009, ‘Overcoming Barriers: Human mobility and development’ has noted that ‘financial remittances are vital to improving the livelihoods of millions of people in developing countries (UNDP 2009: 71). Many empirical studies have confirmed the positive contribution of international remittances to household welfare, nutrition, food, health, and living conditions in places of origin. A World Bank review of remittances to South Asia in 2005 remarked: “The increase in remittance volumes has renewed academic and public policy interest in their potential to reduce poverty and economic vulnerability, improve family welfare, and stimulate local economic development in the face of much lower, and sometimes temperamental FDI flows”(Maimbo, Adams et al. 2005). Global Economic Perspective Report (2006) notes that remittance inflow has made it possible for Bangladesh to cut poverty by 6 per cent. In Nepal, a study done by the Nepal Living Standard Survey found that the contribution of remittances in reducing poverty between 1996 and 2003 was 11 per cent. Other contributors included the increase in agricultural wages, an increase in nonfarm activities, and some reduction in the dependency ratio. Remittances not only help to reduce poverty, but also reduce the depth and severity of poverty in Nepal and other countries (Khatri, 2007).

Conclusion

In line with the propositions of the New Economics of Labour Migration and Livelihood Approaches, migration and remittance play a vital role in the life of migrants and families left behind (Stark, 2009). Over the time, countries like Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and some extent India have built their domestic economies around these migrant flows. While the bilateral ties with GCC have helped South Asia to have consistent flows of labour migration and remittance transfer, but over the time, it has increased the dependence on migration-based economies. Most common examples are Nepal and Indian state Kerala. In the case of both these migrant homelands, remittances have been gradually becoming a sole medium of GDP, which may lead to acute vulnerability in the event of any instability. As migration is a selective process, most international remittances do not tend to flow to the poorest members of communities nor the poorest countries. However, poor non-migrant families often affected indirectly through the economy-wide effects of remittance expenditure on wages, prices, and employment in migrant sending communities.

References:

Afram, G. G. (2012). The Remittance Market in India; Opportunity Challenges and Policy options. Washington: The World Bank.

Cohen, R. (2008). Global Diaspora: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

IOM. (2003). World Migration Report. from International Organization of Migration: http://publications.iom.int/bookstore/index.php?main_page=redirect&action=url&goto=publications.iom.int%2Fbookstore%2Ffree%2FWMR_2003.pdf&zenid=tsehtc7ag1c50f039j4f1vtup7 (Accessed on August 21, 2015)

Kapur, D. (2004). Remittances: The New Development Mantra? Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

Maimbo, S. M., R. Adams, et al. (2005). Migrant Labor Remittances In the South Asia Region. Policy Research Working Paper No.31577. Washington DC, World Bank, February 2005

Naujoks, D. (2009), Emigration, Immigration, and Diaspora Relations in India, Migration Policy Institute,http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=745 (accessed: 19/08/2014)

NSSO. (2010, June). Migration in India 2007-2008. Retrieved April 01, 2014, from National Sample Survey Office: http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/533_final.pdf

Ozaki, Mayumi (2012), Worker Migration and Remittances in South Asia, South Asia Working Paper Series No. 12 May 2012, Asian Development Bank. 

Rahman at el. (2014), Migrant Remittance in South Asia: An Understanding. London: Springer

Rahman, M., & Fee, L. K. (2012, April). Towards a Sociology of Migrant Remittances in Asia: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(4), 689-706.

RBI. (2012, August 16). Survey of Private Remittances to Indian Households with Non-Resident Accounts. Retrieved April 01, 2014, from Reserve Bank of india: http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/content/docs/160812TAB_7.xls

Sridhar K. Khatri (2007), Labor Migration, Employment, and Poverty Alleviation in South Asia. http://www.saceps.org/upload_file/download_pdf/labor%20migration%20whole%20pdf.pdf (Accessed on 20.08.2015)

Stark, O. (2009), Reasons for Remitting, ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 134, Centre for Development Research, Bonn, August, Pp. 15.

Tumbe, C. (2012). Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Working Paper. Retrieved April 01, 2014, from Indian Institute of Management Bangalore: http://www.iimb.ernet.in/research/sites/default/files/WP%20No.%20360.pdf

UNDP. (2009). Human Development Report 2009; overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. United Nations Development programme

United Nations (2013), Making Migration Work, High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development, http://www.un.org/en/ga/68/meetings/migration/ (Accessed on 19.08.2015).

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). 2006. A State of World Population 2006: A Passage to Hope, Women and International Migration. http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2006/pdf/en_sowp06.pdf (Accessed on 21.08.2015)

Wickramasekara, P (2011a), Labour migration in South Asia: A review of issues, policies, and practices. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Wickramasekara, P (2011b), South Asia: Issues on Migration and Development, in Migration, Remittances and Development in South Asia, edited by Kelegama, S. Sri Lanka: Sage Publication. 

World Bank (2013), Migration and Development Brief, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/3349341110315015165/MD_Brief10.pdf  (Accessed on 19.08.2015).

World Bank (2014), Migration and Development Brief, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/3349341288990760745/MigrationandDevelopmentBrief22.pdf  (Accessed on 20.08.2015).

World Bank (2015), Migration and Development Brief, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1288990760745/MigrationandDevelopmentBrief24.pdf (Accessed on 21.08.2015).

   
© 2012-20 GRFDT, All Rights Reserved.Maintained by GRFDT.Designed by Abhinav Jain